lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Which of the latest 2.0.x-versions is stable? None with NFS?


    I recompiled amd, and cp /net/.../linux-2.1.14.tar.gz /dev/null still
    brings the machine to an undignified halt within a minute or two. No panic
    message, nothing in the log files, just a complete stop.

    Just found that cp /.automount/.../linux-2.1.14.tar.gz /dev/null also
    does it, just not as quickly. Fair enough, since it's only one NFS mount
    it's going through, not the two suffered by the first one.

    So I think it's the NFS support in the kernel, not amd. I thought as much
    anyway - even if amd was completely screwed, it shouldn't bring the entire
    machine grinding to a halt if the kernel's sound.

    Is anyone looking into this problem?

    ---- ------------------------------------------------ ----
    David Woodhouse, WWW: http://dwmw2.robinson.cam.ac.uk
    Robinson College, Email: dwmw2@cam.ac.uk
    Cambridge, Tel: +44 (0) 976 658355
    CB3 9AN, (n)talk: dwmw2@dwmw2.robinson.cam.ac.uk
    England. PGP KEY: finger pgp@dwmw2.robinson.cam.ac.uk
    ---- ------------------------------------------------ ----



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.020 / U:31.564 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site