lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: QUOTA (was: Proposal: restrict link(2))

On Fri, 13 Dec 1996, Andrew E. Mileski wrote:

> > Since this is a quota issue, let's just focus on that: If QUOTA's are
> > enabled, we restrict hard link to the owner. Otherwise quota is non-viable.
>
> This is the first reasonable thing I've read in this thread.
> Will everyone please make your opinion of THIS IDEA known,
> or present an alternative (ie. let's get on with it).

Not only the first reasonable, but also the best thing to do.

On a second thought, though... quotas are great if you want to prevent
your users from writing to certain filesystems without having to scan all
directories for stray write permissions. So, I think a run-time option
would be better, settable by quotaon/off. I'm fine even with having it
turned on by default by quotaon, but it should be optional, not imposed.


Ionut

--
It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
than to open it and remove all doubt.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.097 / U:0.312 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site