[lkml]   [1996]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Proposal: restrict link(2)

    On Wed, 11 Dec 1996, Hubert Mantel wrote:

    > I would not like to have /etc/passwd on the same file system as /tmp. I
    > think critical systems should have a really small root partition and
    > everything else should reside on separate partitions, so no hard linking
    > to the files mentioned is possible.

    However, for small code-hackers, who do all sorts of funny things to their
    systems, finding a single linux partition with all of the files on it is a
    _very_ common thing. security should not be denied to these systems.
    However, I don't think that this is necessarily a kernel issue.
    If compatability is hoped to be maintained with more "standard" flavors
    then the commands should probably continue to work basically the same. It
    presents a problem that can and should be easily solved in userspace.
    Having the kernel take care of everything adds to all sorts of
    portability/security problems on other platforms. Even the way that some
    of the includes include other stuff automatically for me has proven to be
    a pain in the butt when trying to port to SunOS (am I seeing funny
    systems, or is every SunOS system's include files really messed up?).
    Being able to assume that there are no hardlinks in /tmp that shouldn't be
    there is not an assumption that I think programs should be able to make.

    Greg Alexander

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.017 / U:92.196 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site