lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: t bit and symlinks patch


can we have tmpfs just in case people forget to flush /tmp too :)

On Sat, 19 Oct 1996, Andrew Tridgell wrote:

> Alan wrote:
> > Nice idea. IMHO however the fix is to stop people writing applications
> > that use /tmp for everything. /tmp was a great idea once upon a time. Its
> > value nowdays is a bit questionable. Better that daemons use /var/run
> > and applications $HOME/.files
>
> I generally agree, its just that I think its hard to actually change
> all those programs (and programmers) out there that use /tmp.
>
> I also think that the change does in fact breath new life into
> /tmp. Are there any /tmp related security holes that it doesn't fix?
> There probably are some, its just that I can't think of them right
> now.
>
> Anyway, I've updated my patch slightly. I changed it so that symlinks
> owned by root are not affected. This is safe and means it breaks less
> things.
>
> With my original patch I found that one thing broke on my mail
> server. I had a link called "tridge" owned by root in /var/spool/mail
> that pointed to /home/tridge/InBox (due to a transition in mailer
> behaviour). I also had /var/spool/mail world writeable with the t bit
> set. My original patch meant I couldn't run programs that referenced
> /var/spool/mail/tridge.
>
> This is now the active bit of the patch:
>
> if (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode) && (dir->i_mode & S_ISVTX) &&
> inode->i_uid != 0 &&
> current->fsuid != inode->i_uid) {
> iput(dir);
> iput(inode);
> *res_inode = NULL;
> return -EPERM;
> }
>
>
> the full patch is available from
> ftp://samba.anu.edu.au/pub/linux/symlink.patch
>
> Cheers, Andrew
>


.sig under construction


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans