lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 1/3] dt-bindings: mtd: Add Loongson-1 NAND Controller
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 3:14 PM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlincom> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> devnull+keguang.zhang.gmail.com@kernel.org wrote on Tue, 30 Apr 2024
> 19:11:10 +0800:
>
> > From: Keguang Zhang <keguang.zhang@gmail.com>
> >
> > Add devicetree binding document for Loongson-1 NAND Controller.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Keguang Zhang <keguang.zhang@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v7:
> > - rename the file to loongson,ls1b-nfc.yaml
> >
> > Changes in v6:
> > - A newly added patch
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/loongson,ls1b-nfc.yaml | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/loongson,ls1b-nfc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/loongson,ls1b-nfc.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..a69f22b9fd9e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/loongson,ls1b-nfc.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mtd/loongson,ls1b-nfc.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Loongson-1 NAND Controller
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Keguang Zhang <keguang.zhang@gmail.com>
> > +
> > +allOf:
> > + - $ref: nand-controller.yaml
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + oneOf:
> > + - const: loongson,ls1b-nfc
>
> What is the rationale behind this choice? Seems like the b variant has
> two possible implementations and should always be preceded by a more
> specific compatible.
>
> As there is currently no description of this controller upstream, I
> would not care too much about any out-of-tree description and directly
> go for a clean description.
>
Excuse me, should I add a description for this property?

> > + - items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - loongson,ls1a-nfc
> > + - loongson,ls1c-nfc
> > + - const: loongson,ls1b-nfc
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + dmas:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + dma-names:
> > + const: rxtx
> > +
> > +patternProperties:
> > + "^nand@[0-3]$":
> > + type: object
> > + $ref: raw-nand-chip.yaml
> > +
> > + unevaluatedProperties: false
> > +
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - reg
> > + - dmas
> > + - dma-names
>
> Should DMA props be required?
>
Yes. This NAND controller only works with DMA, which means the DMA is necessary.

> > +
> > +unevaluatedProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + nand-controller@1fe78000 {
> > + compatible = "loongson,ls1b-nfc";
> > + reg = <0x1fe78000 0x40>;
> > +
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + dmas = <&dma 0>;
> > + dma-names = "rxtx";
>
> There is a preferred spacing for DT nodes, see:
> https://docs.kernel.org/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.html
>
Sorry. I don't get the meaning of preferred spacing.
https://docs.kernel.org/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.html says
"For DTS examples in the schema, preferred is four-space indentation."
Then I used four-space indentation.

> > +
> > + nand@0 {
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + nand-use-soft-ecc-engine;
> > + nand-ecc-algo = "hamming";
>
> These two properties are not needed. Unless there is no hardware ECC
> capability on this controller and in this case you need to ensure the
> properties are present in the schema.

Exactly. This NAND controller doesn't support hardware ECC.
'nand-use-soft-ecc-engine' and 'nand-ecc-algo' are present in nand-chip.yaml.
Is there anything else I should do?

Thanks for your view!
>
> > + };
> > + };
> >
>
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl



--
Best regards,

Keguang Zhang

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-18 10:01    [W:0.051 / U:0.420 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site