Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 17 May 2024 18:55:19 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to check return value of f2fs_allocate_new_section | From | Markus Elfring <> |
| |
… > missed this allocated path, fix it.
* Will another imperative wording be desirable for an improved change description?
* Would you like to add the tag “Fixes”?
* How do you think about to append parentheses to the function name in the summary phrase?
Regards, Markus
| |