lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/9] CPU controller
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:41:09 +0200
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:

> On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 16:26 +0900, MAEDA Naoaki wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 08:59:49 +0200
> > Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> > > You simply cannot ignore interactive tasks. At the very least, you have
> > > to disallow requeue if the resource limit has been exceeded, otherwise,
> > > this patch set is non-functional.
> >
> > It can be easily implemented on top of the current code. Do you know a good
> > sample program that is judged as interactive but consumes lots of cpu?
>
> X sometimes, Mozilla sometimes,... KDE konsole when scrolling,...
> anything that on average sleeps more than roughly 5% of it's slice can
> starve you to death either alone, or (worse) with peers.

They are true interactive tasks, aren't they?
Oh! I should say "that is not interactive, but judged as interactive
and consumes lots of cpu".

Thanks,
MAEDA Naoaki
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-28 09:59    [W:0.083 / U:1.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site