lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/9] CPU controller
Date
On Friday 28 April 2006 22:07, MAEDA Naoaki wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > I agree with Mike here. It's either global resource management or it
> > isn't. If one user is using all interactive tasks and the other user none
> > it's unfair resource management.
>
> My intention was not to hurt interactive task's response, but it seems
> that just ignoring interactive tasks is not good. I'll consider
> regulating interactive tasks also.

I appreciate the gesture of concern over interactive tasks :-) Unfortunately
it doesn't change the fact that interactive tasks can also consume large
proportions of the resources, and that any interactivity estimator will get
it wrong on occasion and flag a non interactive task as interactive.

--
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-28 15:12    [W:0.050 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site