Messages in this thread | | | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/9] CPU controller | Date | Fri, 28 Apr 2006 23:09:31 +1000 |
| |
On Friday 28 April 2006 22:07, MAEDA Naoaki wrote: > Con Kolivas wrote: > > I agree with Mike here. It's either global resource management or it > > isn't. If one user is using all interactive tasks and the other user none > > it's unfair resource management. > > My intention was not to hurt interactive task's response, but it seems > that just ignoring interactive tasks is not good. I'll consider > regulating interactive tasks also.
I appreciate the gesture of concern over interactive tasks :-) Unfortunately it doesn't change the fact that interactive tasks can also consume large proportions of the resources, and that any interactivity estimator will get it wrong on occasion and flag a non interactive task as interactive.
-- -ck - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |