lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: C++ pushback
Date
Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com> writes:

> El Tue, 25 Apr 2006 02:05:29 +0200,
> Harald Arnesen <harald@skogtun.org> escribió:
>
>> The former is easier to read and understand?
>
> C is not perfect, it could very well get a bit improved so it helps to make
> the code more readable, etc (and I mean: just improvements, not "lets try to
> turn C into a OO language"). That however requires modifying the current
> C standards, gcc...
>
> But that doesn't justifies adding C++ support to the kernel.

It was the C version I found easier to understand.
--
Hilsen Harald.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-25 11:15    [W:0.093 / U:2.648 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site