lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: scheduler question 2.6.16.x
Date
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 19:15, Jens Axboe wrote:

> > But I can build both in... so I guess then the kernel decides what is
> > the best to use? Or should it be so I am only allowed to select one
> > or the other and allowing both is an oversight?
>
> See the option no more than two lines down from that, default io
> scheduler. Also see Documentation/block/switching-sched.txt and/or
> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt (elevator=) section.

Hi Jens,

I haven't got the switching-sched.txt, although I found a sched-design.txt...
but what I meant was if I select whatever default, do/can I still need to
select either/or scheduler?

i.e. why doesn't 'default selection option' only allow that scheduler to be
selected?

Nick
--
"Person who say it cannot be done should not interrupt person doing it."
-Chinese Proverb
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-25 20:36    [W:0.044 / U:0.420 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site