Messages in this thread | | | From | "Hua Zhong" <> | Subject | RE: kfree(NULL) | Date | Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:03:57 -0700 |
| |
> > It seems including atomic.h inside compiler.h is a bit > tricky (might have interdependency). > > > > Can we just live with int instead of atomic_t? We don't > really care about losing a count occasionally.. > > It's nice so you don't have to fool around with locking .. > The atomic_t structure is pretty simple thought . I think it > boils down to just an int anyway .
We could move atomic_t into a separate atomic_type.h? I just want to make sure before I mess with the file structure..
Hua
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |