lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: kfree(NULL)
Date
> > It seems including atomic.h inside compiler.h is a bit 
> tricky (might have interdependency).
> >
> > Can we just live with int instead of atomic_t? We don't
> really care about losing a count occasionally..
>
> It's nice so you don't have to fool around with locking ..
> The atomic_t structure is pretty simple thought . I think it
> boils down to just an int anyway .

We could move atomic_t into a separate atomic_type.h? I just want to make sure before I mess with the file structure..

Hua

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-22 01:06    [W:0.044 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site