lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)
From
Date
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:16:46 +0200, Jan Engelhardt said:

> >So, I think the only way to be able to realisticly keep the LSM
> >interface, is for a valid, working, maintained LSM-based security model
> >to go into the kernel tree. So far, I haven't seen any public posting
> >of patches that meet this requirement :(
>
> In that case, maybe it would be worthwhile to flip the positions, i.e. LSM on
> top of SELinux, sort of a compat layer.

How would that *possibly* work? What semantics would *that* have?

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-19 19:09    [W:0.187 / U:3.656 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site