Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC] binary firmware and modules | From | Marcel Holtmann <> | Date | Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:37:22 +0200 |
| |
Hi Mark,
> > I personally prefer full firmware names. This makes the dependency easy > > and even an end user can call modinfo and see what firmware is expected > > by a certain driver (without looking at the source code). > > How does one handle the case of updated firmware from the manufacturer, > which requires *no* driver changes? If the driver has all of the previously > known names/versions hardcoded, then would it refuse to use the new stuff?
if no driver change is needed, then you simply can replace the firmware file and reload the driver. With the BlueFRITZ! USB driver we did this a bunch of times and it worked out perfectly. The firmware name in this case is only a placeholder.
Regards
Marcel
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |