Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:05:44 +0900 | From | "Kazuki Omo(Company)" <> | Subject | Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks |
| |
Hi,
This is my first post. My name is OMO, member of LIDS development team. (LIDS is not IDS. I think the name sometime will cause misunderstanding.)
Actually, LIDS is using LSM Framework from kernel-2.6.0 and keeps developing new one. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-security-module&m=113472048023966&w=2
OMO
Stephen Smalley wrote: (2006/04/18 03:15): > On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 11:02 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: > >>--- Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote: >> >> >>>>Or, better, remove LSM itself ;) >>> >>>Seriously that makes a lot of sense. All other >>>modules people have come up >>>with over the last years are irrelevant and/or >>>broken by design. >> >>Didn't you mean "Bah!" (waves paw)? >> >>I understand the enthusiasm that the SELinux >>following demonstrates for the technology. >>I do not appreciate the bashing of alternatives. > > > Then provide a counterexample. >
-- Kazuki Omo: k-omo@10art-ni.co.jp Group Manager, OSS Technology Group, Linux Technology LIDS Japanese Information: Japanese: http://www.selinux.gr.jp/LIDS-JP/index.html English: http://www.selinux.gr.jp/LIDS-JP/LIDS_en/index.html
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |