lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks
    Hi,

    This is my first post. My name is OMO, member of LIDS development team.
    (LIDS is not IDS. I think the name sometime will cause
    misunderstanding.)

    Actually, LIDS is using LSM Framework from kernel-2.6.0 and
    keeps developing new one.
    http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-security-module&m=113472048023966&w=2

    OMO

    Stephen Smalley wrote: (2006/04/18 03:15):
    > On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 11:02 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
    >
    >>--- Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>>>Or, better, remove LSM itself ;)
    >>>
    >>>Seriously that makes a lot of sense. All other
    >>>modules people have come up
    >>>with over the last years are irrelevant and/or
    >>>broken by design.
    >>
    >>Didn't you mean "Bah!" (waves paw)?
    >>
    >>I understand the enthusiasm that the SELinux
    >>following demonstrates for the technology.
    >>I do not appreciate the bashing of alternatives.
    >
    >
    > Then provide a counterexample.
    >


    --
    Kazuki Omo: k-omo@10art-ni.co.jp
    Group Manager, OSS Technology Group, Linux Technology
    LIDS Japanese Information:
    Japanese: http://www.selinux.gr.jp/LIDS-JP/index.html
    English: http://www.selinux.gr.jp/LIDS-JP/LIDS_en/index.html








    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-04-18 15:08    [W:7.669 / U:0.156 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site