Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:58:26 -0400 (EDT) | From | James Morris <> | Subject | Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks |
| |
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Alan Cox wrote:
> > something like AppArmour provides a much simpler security model for > > If the AppArmour people care to submit their code upstream and get it > merged then that would be a reason to keep LSM, if they don't then LSM > (if they even want it..) can just become part of their patchkit instead.
This is the discussion we had a year ago, and have seen nothing upstream since. I assume they do not intend to submit the code.
- James -- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |