lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: GPL issues
On 4/11/06, David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> wrote:
> OK, simplified rules; if you follow them you should generally be OK:
>
> 1. Changes to kernel --> GPL
>
> 2. Kernel driver --> GPL
>
> 3. Userspace code that uses interfaces that was not exposed to userspace
> before you change the kernel --> GPL (but don't do it; there's almost
> always a reason why an interface is not exported to userspace)
>
> 4. Userspace code that only uses existing interfaces --> choose
> license yourself (but of course, GPL would be nice...)
>
> 5. Userspace code that depends on interfaces you added to the kernel
> --> consult a lawyer (if this interface is something completely new,
> you can *probably* use your own license for the userland part; if the
> interface is more or less a wrapper of existing functionality, GPL)
>
> And of course, I'm not a lawyer either...
Excellent summary except for one case. Propriatary binary allowed in initramfs?
Not that I care.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-12 04:40    [W:0.129 / U:1.540 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site